Admit
it. We have all installed software or made changes to our company
computer without getting the IT people involved. But is this ultimately
a good thing for you or the company? You might not notice any kind of
negative impact in the short run, but everyone feels the pain in the
long run.
Wouldn't it be great if your network was smart enough to let you know
when new software was installed, who installed it, and even
automatically uninstall the program if it was not on the company
supported software list? Well this can be done with a lot or a little
effort depending how you go about it.
For our clients, this will be easy and a part of our Waident Watch
technology which we will be rolling out by the end of the year. Our
Waident Watch system will be able to stop rogue software installations,
report on installed software (individually and company wide), auto
software installations, service pack updates, complete network performance monitoring, and
security checks just to name a few of the features.
By Tom Jowitt
— Techworld —
Businesses increasingly accept the existence of a "shadow" IT culture, in
which end users install uncontrolled "rogue" technology to make good the
shortcomings of overstretched IT departments, according to a survey.
Rogue IT includes users installing software, or tampering with existing
software or macros, without the IT department's consent, according to the
survey, by integration specialist Blue Prism. Budget and resource constraints
often lead to elements of rogue behavior, reported by 67 percent of respondents
to the survey. Twenty-four percent believed that rogue IT isn't used in their
organizations and 10 percent admitted they didn't know.
It seems that end-users are increasingly aware nowadays that their IT
department cannot always deliver a practical solution for their needs, which can
lead to the creation of a "shadow IT culture" within an organization, whereby
users actively install their own applications or find their own work-around
solutions in order to do their day-to-day job.
This is often because IT departments have to manage business-critical
projects, sometimes at the expense of helping business users with tactical
change requests. Indeed, over 52 percent reported that working on strategic
projects was the main focus for their department with 40 percent saying that
delivering day to day business change requests was their priority.
Other areas of focus for the IT department included: fire fighting,
application and data center consolidation, data processing, user communications,
and functionality.
Under-resourced IT is blamed heavily, with more than 71 percent of
respondents to the Blue Prism survey citing IT department resource constraints
as the reason why they are not able to satisfy all requests from the business,
followed by 67 percent of respondents who believed that IT department budget
constraints were the key factor. Meanwhile, 24 percent of respondents cited an
unreasonable number of requests from users as a prime reason for failing to
satisfy change requests.
Of those surveyed however, 52 percent believed that they are able to satisfy
over 75 percent of change requests and only 10 percent of respondents felt that
they were able to manage fewer than 25 percent of requests.
Finally, the traditional perception of IT departments frowning upon rogue
behavior by users is also challenged by the Blue Prism survey. It concludes that
many IT departments fully understand why pockets of rogue behavior exist, and
reveals these departments were equally pragmatic when asked for the best way of
dealing with it.
Three quarters (75 percent) suggested strategic controls, such as a strong
governance model where collaboration between IT and the business is encouraged,
need to be put in place to help the technology department cope with the rogue IT
behavior. Interestingly, only 10 percent favored introducing measures to
eradicate it.
© IDG 2007
|